Written by: Andrew Cohen, CFA, CPA, Managing Partner, Condesa Financial Group

What You Will Gain From This 90-Day Plan

• Inefficient accounting processes cost SMEs significant time, with month-end closes averaging 10–15 days and consuming nearly half of available working time each month.
• A structured 90-day plan, broken into standardize, automate, and optimize phases, provides a week-by-week roadmap that prevents the common mistake of automating broken processes.
• Diagnosis is essential. Mapping workflows, identifying bottlenecks, and eliminating redundant tasks before any technology investment dramatically improves success rates.
• Process improvements must preserve internal controls, including segregation of duties, approval workflows, and audit trails, to avoid compliance risks while accelerating close cycles.
• Condesa Financial offers expert guidance and fractional CFO services to help SMEs execute this plan and achieve sustainable accounting improvements. Talk to a fractional CFO about your next steps.

Before You Begin: Diagnosing Your Current Processes

Poor data quality is the most common reason finance automation underdelivers, and the root cause is almost always a broken process that was automated before it was understood. The diagnosis phase exists to prevent that outcome.

Start with a simple flowcharting exercise for the month-end close. List every task from transaction posting to final financial statement delivery. For each task, record who performs it, how long it takes, what tools are used, and where errors or delays occur.

Use these diagnostic questions with your team:

• Where do errors most frequently occur?
• Which tasks consume the most time?
• What do team members dread doing each month?
• Which reports are produced but never read?
• Where are manual workarounds masking system limitations?

Company size, growth stage, and whether finance is handled internally or outsourced all affect which improvements deliver the most value. Some companies have reduced close times significantly by first mapping their close process and identifying where time is spent waiting for information from other departments, rather than on accounting tasks.

Get a free process assessment.

Once you have mapped your current processes and identified the bottlenecks, you are ready to move into the structured 90-day plan below.

The 90-Day Implementation Plan

The table below maps each two-week block to a focus area, key actions, owner, and expected outcome, so you can see how the plan progresses from diagnosis to continuous improvement.

Days 1–30: Standardize and Simplify

The governing principle for this phase is simple: simplify before you automate. Standardizing procedures, documentation, and naming conventions before touching any technology prevents the common mistake of automating a broken process.

Create a close calendar. A documented, assigned close checklist is the single most impactful change for close acceleration. Assign each task an owner and a hard deadline, and this one change alone moves most SMEs from an ad hoc close to a repeatable one.

Standardize your chart of accounts. Inconsistent account codes are a primary cause of voucher errors and rework. Chart-of-accounts harmonization across entities is typically a three-to-six-month effort and must precede multi-entity process standardization to deliver full value. Start this work now even if completion extends beyond the 90-day window.

Conduct a “zombie tasks” audit. Identify and eliminate redundant or obsolete tasks, such as reports no one reads, manual workarounds that software updates have solved, and duplicate approvals. A well-documented finance workflow typically reduces processing cycle times by 30–50%.

Implement a document management system. Move from scattered email attachments and shared drives to a centralized repository with consistent naming conventions. This shift reduces reconciliation time and creates the audit trail infrastructure that later phases depend on.

Days 31–60: Automate High-Volume Tasks

After simplification, automation becomes straightforward. Focus on repetitive, high-volume, low-judgment tasks first. These processes deliver the fastest and most measurable return from technology.

Automate recurring journal entries. Depreciation, prepaid amortizations, and payroll accruals should be scheduled, not manually entered each month. This change reduces manual journal entry volume and frees controller time for analysis.

Use bank feeds for reconciliation. Automated bank feeds eliminate manual data entry and enable continuous reconciliation. Best-in-class teams achieve 90%+ auto-match rates on high-volume workflows.

Implement approval workflows for invoices. Automated approval routing reduces invoice cycle time from a market average of 8.2 days to under 2 days for best-in-class AP teams. For a company processing hundreds of invoices monthly, this improvement is material.

Maintain internal controls during automation. Every automated process needs a human review point. Segregation of duties means splitting the critical steps of a process, such as initiation, approval, execution, recording, and review, so that no single person can both create and validate a risky transaction. Automation should enforce this structure.

With high-volume tasks automated and controls in place, the next phase shifts from implementation to measurement and continuous improvement.

Days 61–90: Optimize and Measure

The third phase shifts focus from implementation to continuous improvement and to establishing the metrics that prove progress.

Establish KPIs. Track days to close, number of manual journal entries, reconciliation completion rate, and error rates. High-performing mid-market finance teams target a five-business-day close, while best-in-class teams achieve three to four business days. A voucher error rate above 1% is a danger signal for both rework costs and internal control risk.

Implement a monthly review process. After each close, conduct a brief retrospective. Capture what went well, what caused delays, and what should change next month. This habit turns process improvement from a one-time project into a continuous discipline.

Introduce continuous accounting. Shift from batch-processing at month-end to spreading close tasks throughout the period. Organizations with mature AI accounting implementations have close cycles that compress because automated processes operate continuously rather than waiting for month-end batch processing. This approach gives management real-time visibility into cash flow and profitability.

Overcoming Compliance Fears and Maintaining Controls

The compliance fear that blocks SMEs from changing processes is real but manageable. The strict compliance focus in traditional accounting often deters teams from pursuing process changes because of perceived regulatory risk. Evidence shows that structured process improvement strengthens internal controls rather than weakening them.

Use the following guidance to maintain controls through the transition:

• Preserve segregation of duties. In very small businesses where full segregation is not always possible, compensating controls like owner review of transactions are needed. Where full separation is not feasible, document the exception and the compensating control.
• Maintain approval workflows. Automated approvals should still route to the right reviewer. The approval must happen before payment.
• Keep audit trails enabled. Modern accounting software provides built-in audit trails logging every transaction with user, date, and time. Confirm these are active and reviewed regularly.
• Document controls. Even a one-page control document ensures staff know expectations, controls survive staff turnover, and compliance can be demonstrated to auditors, lenders, or regulators.

A faster close that produces more post-close adjustments does not represent improvement. The goal is speed and accuracy together.

Common Mistakes and Troubleshooting

Several recurring mistakes derail accounting process improvement initiatives.

• Automating a broken process. If the underlying workflow is flawed, automation makes the flaws faster. As emphasized earlier, simplify first.
• Skipping the diagnosis phase. Jumping straight to software selection without understanding the as-is state leads to tool sprawl and fragmented data. 89% of accountants say their existing digital solutions need better integration, and firms now juggle an average of 8 different digital tools.
• Failing to get buy-in from the team. Process changes fail when the people doing the work are not consulted. Involve team members in mapping and redesign from the start.
• Chasing 100% automation. Complex judgment calls, strategic advisory conversations, and novel situations remain human responsibilities and should stay that way.

Watch for these warning signs that improvements are not working as intended:

• A faster close that produces more post-close adjustments.
• An auto-match rate that only covers the easiest transactions while exception queues grow.
• Exception rates climbing while cost per invoice falls, which signals that review work is being deferred rather than eliminated.

How to Evaluate Progress

Evaluate whether improvements are working by tracking process maturity indicators, rather than business outcomes that depend on factors outside finance’s control.

Key indicators to monitor include the following:

• Faster close times. Track days from period end to finalized financial statements. As mentioned, top-performing organizations achieve close cycles of approximately 4–5 days.
• Fewer errors. Monitor voucher error rate and post-close adjustments. As noted earlier, a voucher error rate above 1% signals rework costs and control risk; the main causes are missing document attachments and inconsistent account code judgments.
• Cleaner records. Reconciliation completion rate and aged reconciling items should trend toward zero.
• Improved management visibility. Real-time dashboards and faster reporting cycles indicate process maturity. 51% of CFOs rank improving financial forecast accuracy among their top five priorities, and a faster close is the foundation for better forecasting.

Advanced Considerations and Strategic Next Steps

After the 90-day plan stabilizes the accounting function, the next layer of value comes from building on that foundation.

• Integrating FP&A. Once accounting processes are stable, layer on financial planning and analysis, including forecasting, budgeting, and scenario planning. 45% of accountants are responding to economic volatility by performing financial forecasting and scenario planning.
• Financial modeling. For fundraising, M&A, or new business lines, deal-level models that project profitability and cash flow require clean, reliable accounting data as their input, which the 90-day plan produces.
• Hiring a fractional CFO. For SMEs lacking internal executive finance leadership, a fractional CFO provides strategic oversight, answers the harder questions, and directs the accounting team. This layer translates process improvement into business strategy.

For SMEs without internal expertise to execute this plan, Condesa Financial Group provides price-competitive fractional CFO and outsourced accounting services staffed with ex-Big 4 talent. The firm’s nearshore delivery model is built on Panama and Mexico City professionals deeply familiar with US accounting practices. This model makes Big-4-caliber work accessible at below-US-market rates for companies in high-cost markets like New York, Chicago, and San Francisco.

Start your 90-day plan with expert help.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are some examples of process improvements in accounting?

Common examples include creating a documented close calendar with assigned owners and hard deadlines, standardizing the chart of accounts to eliminate inconsistent account codes, automating recurring journal entries such as depreciation and prepaid amortizations, implementing bank feeds for continuous reconciliation, and establishing approval workflows for invoices. Some companies have reduced close times significantly by first mapping their close process and identifying where time is spent waiting for information from other departments. For instance, a 35-employee professional services SME reduced monthly closing time from 12 to 4 working days and lowered its error rate from 4.2% to 0.8% within three months of implementing automation. The common thread across successful examples is that standardization preceded automation in every case.

How do I get buy-in from my team for accounting process changes?

Start by involving team members in the diagnosis and redesign process. When people help map current workflows and identify pain points, they are more likely to support the changes that follow. Next, frame improvements as reducing tedious, repetitive work rather than eliminating roles, because automation frees time for higher-value analysis and advisory work, a shift that most accounting professionals welcome. Then assign clear ownership for each improvement initiative so team members have accountability and visibility into progress. Finally, after each close, conduct a brief retrospective that includes the full team, which turns process improvement into a shared discipline rather than a top-down mandate.

How long does it take to see results from accounting process improvement?

Most SMEs see measurable improvements within 30–60 days of implementing standardization and automation. The first 30 days of standardization, including creating a close calendar, cleaning the chart of accounts, and eliminating zombie tasks, typically produce visible close-time reductions without any new technology investment. Automation in days 31–60 accelerates those gains. Full optimization, including stable KPI tracking and continuous accounting practices, typically takes 90 days or more. The 90-day timeline is a realistic target for moving from an ad hoc, error-prone close to a governed, measurable process. Sustaining those gains requires treating process improvement as an ongoing discipline, rather than a one-time project.

What is the difference between process improvement and automation in accounting?

Process improvement is the broader discipline of diagnosing inefficiencies, standardizing workflows, and measuring results. Automation is one tool within that discipline, applying technology to eliminate manual, repetitive tasks. The sequence matters, so simplify first and then automate. If you automate a broken process, the flaws become faster and harder to diagnose. A chart of accounts with inconsistent coding will produce unreliable categorization regardless of who does the work. Process improvement addresses the root cause, and automation scales the solution. For SMEs, this distinction is especially important because the temptation to buy software before fixing the process is strong, and that approach fails frequently.

When should an SME consider hiring a fractional CFO?

An SME should consider a fractional CFO when the accounting function is stable but strategic questions remain unanswered, such as questions about cash flow forecasting, tax structuring, fundraising readiness, or profitability by business line. A fractional CFO is also the right move when the business has an accountant or bookkeeper but no executive finance layer to direct them and answer harder questions. Signs that the gap exists include recurring errors that no one is accountable for fixing, financial reports that arrive too late to inform decisions, and an owner spending significant time on financial data entry rather than strategy. A fractional CFO paired with a strong outsourced accounting team creates a complete finance function at a fraction of the cost of building one internally.

Conclusion: Your 90-Day Plan Starts Now

The 90-day plan follows a clear sequence: diagnose your current processes in weeks 1–2, standardize and simplify in weeks 3–4, automate high-volume tasks in weeks 5–8, and optimize and measure in weeks 9–12. A structured approach, rather than ad hoc tool purchases, is what transforms an inefficient finance function into a strategic asset.

Process improvement is a continuous discipline. The retrospective after each close, the quarterly KPI review, and the annual reassessment of which controls still fit the business are the practices that separate SMEs that sustain their gains from those that revert to old habits after the initial push.

When you need expert guidance to execute, Condesa Financial Group provides price-competitive fractional CFO and outsourced accounting leadership with ex-Big 4 talent, delivered through a nearshore model built for US SMEs.

Transform your accounting processes with a free consultation.